![]() However I can see how you'd want to stick with the perpetual license of your older version of Photoshop. Photoshop CC by contrast is quite sophisticated software and I don't mind paying the monthly fee for CC given the level of quality of the software. Finally LR only utilizes one core on my 8-core CPU. Other things that I don't like about Lightroom include sharpening and noise reduction which are, to my perception not very sophisticated (compared to Photoshop CC which has excellent sharpening options). ![]() Of Adobe's converters I can live with ACR more easily than the limited options available within the Lightroom interface (even if it uses some of the same code). There are black and white conversion with filter presets in LR but they seem to adjust white balance which I want to control separately. I haven't really figured out a way to get LR's black and white conversion settings to work for me. Today I can even set the filtering used for monochrome images in camera, and to further tweak the images without having to start from scratch in Adobe raw converter, with Nikon's converter I can just start from where I left off in the camera settings and continue tweaking the image from there. One reason is that I prefer the way the Nikon converters handle noise towards high ISOs, and another is that they obey instructions set in the camera as to how the raw conversion should be made (picture control settings). I like to use Nikon raw converters myself although I use Adobe software for retouching, colour adjustments, sharpening, and printing. NX-D's 1.0 version was ridden with bugs and other issues but the latest 1.10 seems to work ok on my computer. View NX's latest version crashes frequently on my computer but the previous version works fine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |